• excitingburp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mine was at 16 because my foreskin stopped growing. I honestly would have preferred to have it done at birth before I could remember the pain (like my brothers).

    • Maggoty
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, but that’s not a good reason to make it standard practice.

      • excitingburp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did I say it was?

        The point is that there are exceptions and it’s not always “mutilation.”

        • Maggoty
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay? I don’t think anyone was arguing against medically necessary stuff

        • orrk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          an amputation, even for medical reasons, is a mutilation

      • TokenBoomer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, my anecdotal experience says otherwise. /s

    • Agent641
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I never learned to roll back my foreskin when I was a wee lad and so once when I was 8 it got infected and I had to apply ointment to it and keep gradually peeling it back from its swollen and cemented position like trying to squeeze a tennis ball out of a tight gym sock. it hurt to pee for a week. Still, Im glad to have my foreskin.

OSZAR »