• redlemace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So they want Greenland AND eggs?

    Whats next? B&O? Volbeat? Carlsberg? (Although anyone that tried their pide known as budweiser know the won’t be able to handle Carlsberg)

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m guessing Greenland is our strategic position to begin enveloping Canada, then we can direct our attention East.

      Sorry.

      Also we have Carlsbad at home

        • BearGun@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The northern areas are going to become more habitable

          If the AMOC collapses they’ll become significantly less habitable, and that’s looking more likely to happen by the year.

        • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I have considered that USA would have to migrate North. To plan for it while denying that anything is wrong is true evil.

        • grue
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think Trump wants control of trade routes (specifically, the Northwest Passage). That also explains why he’s going after the Panama Canal at the same time.

            • grue
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That was from before we decided to install a dictator and become a rogue state.

                • grue
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Hmm… maybe. I’m not sure if “key partner” is actually as special as it sounds, or if it’s just puffery. It could be that a bunch of countries are “key partners” and it just happened to get mentioned in Panama’s report because the writer couldn’t think of something more specific to say. It would be more persuasive if we had the whole list of “key partners” and could show that the US is targeting all of them preferentially compared to countries with less cooperative status.

OSZAR »